Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Screening to Facilitate Early Prevention

Editorial to accompany the article: “Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment” by Klose et al. in this issue of Deutsches Ärzteblatt International

The fact that familial hypercholesterolemia patients have massively increased LDL cholesterol-dependent cardiovascular risk and that the increase in risk can be almost eliminated by consistently lowering LDL cholesterol is the most conclusive evidence yet found of the close causal relationship between elevated LDL cholesterol and atherosclerosis. Familial hypercholesterolemia therefore continues to fascinate both scientists and clinicians and drives new developments in diagnosis and treatment. This is described by Klose et al. in their article reviewing the current knowledge on this subject.

Atherogenic potential

Anitschkow postulated as early as the beginning of the 20^th century that elevated cholesterol levels play a vital role in the development of atherosclerosis (1). Research conducted in recent decades has shown that atherogenic potential is inherent in virtually all cases of elevated LDL cholesterol and that the risk of cardiovascular diseases can be reduced by approximately 30% if LDL cholesterol levels are lowered, particularly using statins (2). The absolute risk for a cardiovascular event plays a major role in assessing what level of LDL cholesterol requires treatment. This risk is higher in individuals with confirmed atherosclerosis or additional risk factors, so in such cases the target LDL cholesterol level is lower (e.g. less than 70 mg/dL in patients with confirmed coronary heart disease [CHD]) or more intensive statin therapy is indicated (3, 4).

Early, consistent treatment

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia have significantly elevated LDL cholesterol from birth onwards, so their absolute risk is 8 to 10 times greater (depending on the LDL cholesterol level) than that of individuals with normal lipid metabolism (5). Treatment must be provided early and consistently, independently of other risk factors; this can achieve a major reduction in the rate of myocardial infarctions. The data available on this subject, a great deal of which comes from the Netherlands and South Africa, is convincing: early, consistent treatment leads to almost normal life expectancy (6, 7). This makes early diagnosis, before any manifestation of atherosclerosis if possible, even more important.

The significance of cascade screening

Screening relatives of individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia is extremely important in this context. Because heredity is autosomal dominant, an average of 50% of an index patient’s first-degree relatives are also affected by familial hypercholesterolemia. Such a screening procedure, called cascade screening, makes it possible to provide early preventive treatment for patients’ relatives. Although statin therapy is currently standard treatment for cardiology patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, the potential of screening is still overlooked (8). All too often, the opportunity to search for other affected individuals among the relatives of an identified patient, and then to provide them with sustained treatment, is not taken. Treatment is needed in such cases in order not to miss chances for early prevention.

The value of molecular genetic diagnostics

The review article by Klose et al. rightly discusses the value of molecular genetic diagnostics (9). Although such diagnostic procedures are the standard in some European countries, such as the Netherlands, they are the exception in most countries, including Germany. As undisputed as the value of genetic diagnostics is scientifically, its clinical value is still an open question, as it remains expensive. Evidence of a mutation can be useful in increasing acceptance of the disease in those who suffer from it, and this in turn leads to better treatment compliance. Better compliance is itself associated with a lower rate of myocardial infarctions (10). Clinical measures, however, are not directly affected by evidence of a mutation. It is primarily the phenotype (elevated LDL cholesterol), not the genotype (evidence of a mutation), that is treated. It is also unclear what action should be taken in individuals who present the phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia but do not have an identifiable mutation. Should such patients receive different treatment from those who present identically except for having an identifiable mutation? Ultimately, it is the clinician who must decide; and clinicians will quite rightly be guided by LDL levels. Decisions as to whether or not molecular genetic diagnostics should be performed must also take into account that a genetically identified disorder may have social law-related repercussions affecting areas such as choice of occupation, civil servant status, or life insurance.

Hypercholesterolemia as model disease

In their review article, Klose et al. also describe promising new developments in pharmacological treatment. The clinical picture of familial hypercholesterolemia has been the model disease for the use of statins ever since these powerful lipid lowering drugs were developed. New drugs (PCSK9 antibodies) are currently being developed that may lead to a greater reduction in LDL than statins in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (11). These also show particular potential in patients with severe LDL hypercholesterolemia; in other words, patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Parhofer has received fees for Advisory Board activities from Amgen, Aegerion, Chiesi, Isis, Regeneron, and Sanofi.

He has received fees for contributing to continuing medical education events from Abbott, Amgen, Fresenius, Genzyme, Kaneka, MSD, and Sanofi.

He has received reimbursement of conference fees and of travel and accommodation expenses from MSD.

He has received payment into a third-party account for a research project he himself initiated from Genzyme, MSD, and Novartis.

Translated from the original German by Caroline Devitt, M.A.

Corresponding author:
Prof. Dr. med. Klaus G. Parhofer
Klinikum der Universität München
Medizinische Klinik II, Grosshadern
Marchioninistr. 15
81366 München, Germany

Cite this as:
Parhofer KG: Familial hypercholesterolemia—screening
to facilitate early prevention. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 521–2. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0521

References

1. Anitschkow N, Chalatow S: Über experimentelle Cholesterinsteatose und ihre Bedeutung für die Entstehung einiger pathologischer Prozesse. Centralbl Allg Pathol Pathol Anatomie 1913; 14: 1–9.

2. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al.: Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010; 376: 1670–81.

3. Catapano AL, Reiner Z, De Backer G, et al.: ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Atherosclerosis 2011; 217: 3–46.

4. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al.: ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2014 (in press).

5. Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Sijbrands EJ, Kastelein JJ, Defesche JC: Low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutations and cardiovascular risk in a large genetic cascade screening population. Circulation 2002; 106: 3031–6.

6. Raal FJ, Pilcher GJ, Panz VR, et al.: Reduction in mortality in subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia associated with advances in lipid-lowering therapy. Circulation 2011; 124: 2202–7.

7. Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M, et al.: Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ 2008; 337: a2423.

8. Watts GF, Gidding S, Wierzbicki AS, et al.: Integrated guidance on the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the International FH Foundation. Int J Cardiol 2014; 171: 309–25.

9. Klose G, Laufs U, März W, Windler E: Familial hypercholesterolemia: developments in diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111: 523–9.

10. Wei L, MacDonald TM, Watson AD, Murphy MJ: Effectiveness of two statin prescribing strategies with respect to adherence and cardiovascular outcomes: observational study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16: 385–92.

11. Raal F, Scott R, Somaratne R, et al.: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects of AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: the Reduction of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibition in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Disorder (RUTHERFORD) randomized trial. Circulation 2012; 126: 2408–17.