cme
Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
; ; ; ;
Background: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a condition of multifactorial origin, is a major cause of irreversible vision loss in industrialized countries. The dry late stage of the disease, known as geographic atrophy (GA), is characterized by progressive loss of photoreceptor cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells in the central retina. An estimated 300 000 to 550 000 people in Germany suffer from GA.
Methods: This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Web of Science databases.
Results: In 2023, the complement inhibitors pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol were approved in the USA for repeated intravitreal injections and thereby became the first drugs ever approved for the treatment of GA. In Europe, the marketing authorization application for both drugs was withdrawn by the manufacturers after a negative judgment was expressed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). The EMA stated that the significant slowing of atrophy progression that had been achieved in the approval trials did not lead to any clinically relevant functional benefit for the patients. Further treatment approaches, including gene therapy, are now being studied in clinical trials. There is evidence that micronutrients may slow the progression of atrophy.
Conclusion: In Europe at present, there is no approved treatment for GA due to AMD. There is thus a continuing need for preventive and rehabilitative measures such as smoking cessation, a balanced diet, and magnifying visual aids for patients in the advanced stages of the disease.
Cite this as: Liakopoulos S, von der Emde L, Biller ML, Ach T, Holz FG: Geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2025; 122: 82–8. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0003


For many people, sight is the most important sense. In a representative survey of the German population, 67% of respondents said that blindness was the type of sensory loss that they feared most, and one in ten considered blindness to be the worst possible health problem, even compared to cancer, dementia, or stroke (1). In industrialized countries, the late form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of irreversible vision loss and legal blindness in industrialized countries in people over the age of 60 (2, 3). Blindness is legally defined as a visual acuity of ≤ 0.02 (20/1000) even with optimal visual aids on the better eye, or any other equivalent permanent impairment of vision. The prevalence of AMD in Europe is 12.3% in persons over the age of 45, in persons over age the age of 55 the prevalence of late-stage AMD is 0.5% (3). Due to demographic changes, it is estimated that the absolute number of patients with AMD will nearly double by 2050 (4).
In the early stages of AMD, patients often notice gradual worsening vision and difficulty in adjusting to suboptimal light conditions (5). In the late stage, there may be marked visual loss leading to inability to read and, possibly, legal blindness. The late stage is characterized either by secondary formation of pathological, hyperpermeable blood vessels in or beneath the retina (neovascular AMD), or by geographic atrophy (GA) with progressive loss of the choriocapillaris, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and photoreceptors (6).
Repeated intravitreal injections of VEGF inhibitors have been available since 2006 as a treatment for neovascular AMD. This can often improve vision and has lowered the incidence of blindness in persons over age 50 by approximately half since the treatment was approved, from 52.2 to 25.7 cases per 100 000 persons worldwide between 2000 and 2010 (7).
An estimated 300 000–550 000 people in Germany suffer from GA (8). In a cohort analysis of 1901 British patients with bilateral GA, two-thirds were unable to drive on their initial presentation, 7% were classified as blind, and a further 16% became blind after a median interval of 6 years (9). No treatment for GA has yet been approved in Europe. Two agents, pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol, were approved for the first time in the USA in 2023. In phase III trials, continuous monthly or bi-monthly intravitreal injections of these complement inhibitors led to significantly less enlargement of the area of atrophy than in the control groups (10, 11). However, the achievement of this primary endpoint was not accompanied by a significant benefit in secondary functional endpoints, such as best-corrected visual acuity.
In Europe, the marketing authorization application for both drugs was withdrawn by the manufacturers after a negative judgment from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Other therapeutic approaches are under investigation in clinical trials, including neuroprotection, visual cycle inhibitors, stem cell therapies, gene therapy, and subretinal implants (12). Modern high-resolution imaging, sometimes combined with analyses by artificial intelligence, are being used to study the course of this phenotypically highly variable disease, as well as the efficacy of new treatments and potential variations across individuals in responsiveness to treatment (13, 14, 15).
Learning objectives
This article is intended to give readers knowledge of the following:
- recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of geographic atrophy,
- the frequency and significance of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration,
- the uses of multimodal imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of geographic atrophy, and
- current approaches to the prevention and treatment of the disease.
Methods
This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Web of Science databases employing the search terms “geographic atrophy” and “multimodal imaging.”
Pathogenesis
AMD is of multifactorial origin. Among its risk factors, age, sex, and ethnicity are non-modifiable, while diet and lifestyle are modifiable. Large-scale population studies (the Blue Mountains Eye Study, the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, and the Beaver Dam Eye Study) identified smoking as a major independent risk factor for both the onset and progression of AMD (OR 2 to 4) (16, 17, 18, 19). The incidence and prevalence of GA rise with age (hazard ratio 1.14–1.18 per year, corresponding to an approximately 40-fold increased risk at age 85 compared to age 60) (3, 20). The risk of onset and progression of AMD is higher in women than in men, both for early-onset AMD (OR 2.2) and late-onset AMD (OR 1.6–2.6). Moreover, all manifestations of AMD are more common in the European population than in the Asian population (12.3% vs. 7.4%; Bayes factor 4.3 [moderate evidence]) (3).
Genome-wide association studies have so far identified 52 genetic variants at 34 different loci that are independently associated with AMD and that affect, in particular, lipid metabolism, the extracellular matrix, and the complement system (21). The two loci most frequently associated with AMD are the age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2/high-temperature requirement factor A1 (ARMS2/HTRA1) and the extended region of complement factor H (CFH) (22).
Among clinical findings, soft drusen in the center of the macula and pigmentary changes are considered to be the main risk factors for progression to late-stage AMD. Eyes with AMD show a wide range of structural abnormalities, including not only soft drusen, but also subretinal drusenoid deposits (so-called reticular pseudodrusen), basal laminar deposits, and vitelliform deposits (23) (Figure 1). These deposits often gradually worsen over the years; the dry late form of the disease is characterized by progressive atrophy of the RPE and outer retina. Within the area of atrophy, retinal function is markedly impaired. The disease often begins outside the center of the macula and then slowly expands. In a large-scale study, the mean interval from the initial diagnosis of non-central GA to foveal involvement was 3.2 ± 1.5 years (24). Once the fovea is affected, best-corrected central visual acuity decreases. This renders the patient unable to drive and impairs reading ability as well as face recognition (Figure 2).
Diagnostic evaluation
For many years, the standard diagnostic technique for AMD was clinical examination with funduscopy or color fundus photography. Large-scale epidemiological studies on the prevalence and progression of the disease are, therefore, based on the use of these methods to detect drusen and pigment changes. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) revealed that the risk of developing late-stage AMD within five years rises from 0.4% in eyes without large drusen (≥125 µm) and pigmentary changes to nearly 50% when both are found in both eyes (25).
Technological advances in retinal imaging have led to the development of newer multimodal imaging methods (Figure 3) that should enable the identification of new biomarkers, the evaluation of their prognostic relevance, and thus a better understanding of the pathogenesis of AMD (26). The Classification of Atrophy Meeting (CAM) Group, an international expert panel, has issued recommendations for the use of the various imaging techniques, as well as definitions to enable the standardized analysis and interpretation of study data (27, 28, 29, 30). One important noninvasive imaging technique is optical coherence tomography (OCT; spectral domain OCT [SD-OCT] or swept source OCT [SS-OCT]), which is now widely used and can generate high-resolution, cross-sectional images of the retina with near-histological detail within seconds. OCT can detect risk factors for GA even in the early stages of AMD (24). GA is seen in OCT as thinning of the outer retinal layers, loss of reflectivity of the RPE, and associated increased transmission of light into the choroid (complete RPE and outer retinal atrophy, cRORA) (29).
Another imaging technique used in the diagnostic evaluation of GA, especially in larger hospitals and clinical trials, is fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Autofluorescence images capture the intrinsic fluorescence of molecules at the fundus when illuminated with light of a specific wavelength. The autofluorescence signal is decreased in the area of RPE atrophy because it contains lower amounts of lipofuscin, so this method can be used to detect GA objectively and reproducibly. Quantitative measurements of the GA area on FAF images are strongly correlated with measurements on color fundus images (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.9) (31). The change in the area of GA in the FAF has been accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a morphological endpoint of clinical trials (13). Software programs from the manufacturers of imaging devices enable the quantitative assessment of various parameters with automatic segmentation (13). The quality of evaluation is continually improving through refinements in technology (32). Many biomarkers can now be quantitatively measured and displayed for easy visual interpretation (Figure 2) (33). These analyses are helpful in clinical practice for patient counseling and follow-up examinations,, as well as for evaluations in the setting of clinical trials.
Therapeutic approaches
General measures such as a balanced Mediterranean diet, protection from sunlight, and not smoking can beneficially affect the progression of AMD. The ARED study showed in 2001 that dietary supplements can lower the risk of conversion of intermediate AMD to late AMD (34). The ARED2 study examined various modifications to the composition of these dietary supplements and showed that replacing beta-carotene with lutein and zeaxanthin was helpful, because beta-carotene was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer in smokers (35). The formulation found to be effective in the ARED2 study contains 500 mg vitamin C, 400 IU vitamin E, 2 mg copper oxide, 10 mg lutein, 2 mg zeaxanthin, and 80 mg zinc oxide. In 2020, the same research group showed that a Mediterranean diet can also significantly lower the risk of conversion to a late-stage form of AMD, particularly to GA (36). A recent retrospective analysis of AREDS2 study data further revealed that a Mediterranean diet can be beneficial to persons who already have GA by slowing the growth of the atrophic area (24). Among these patients, there were also indications that the use of dietary supplements (especially antioxidants including lutein/zeaxanthin) might slow the progression of GA towards the fovea (37); these findings must now be confirmed in a prospective trial in order to prove the benefit of taking these supplements in patients with extrafoveal GA.
No drug for GA has yet been approved in Europe. In 2023, the FDA approved two complement inhibitors for intravitreal administration for the treatment of GA. Pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol are injected intravitreally once a month or once every two months (10, 11). The goal of treatment is to slow the growth of GA. In contrast to anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular AMD, an improvement in visual acuity is not expected. The OAKS and DERBY trials (two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled phase III trials evaluating the C3 complement inhibitor pegcetacoplan, NCT03525613 and NCT03525600) and the GATHER 2 trial (a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled phase III trial to evaluate the C5 complement inhibitor avacincaptad pegol, NCT04435366) yielded positive findings with respect to their primary endpoint, with a significant reduction by about 20% in the enlargement of the area of GA, compared to a control group with sham injections (10, 11). This morphological parameter is used as a surrogate marker for disease progression and reflects the structural effect of the intervention. The best-corrected central visual acuity may remain unchanged despite the progression of atrophy, as long as GA has not yet reached the fovea. It had been hoped that slowing the enlargement of GA would preserve foveal integrity longer and delay the worsening of central vision, but none of the above trials yielded a significant difference between the treatment and control groups in the change in visual acuity over the period of observation. The reasons for this are not well understood and require further study (38).
In all of these trials, a larger amount of exudative macular neovascularization was observed as an adverse event in the treatment arms (5% in the monthly treatment arm with avacincaptad pegol versus 3% in the control group in the first year in the GATHER-2 study; 11–13% in the monthly treatment arms with pegcetacoplan versus 2–4% in the control groups of the OAKS and DERBY studies within 24 months) and required additional treatment with intravitreal VEGF inhibitors (10, 11). Moreover, isolated cases of intraocular inflammation, some with occlusive vasculitis, and isolated cases of visual worsening and even blindness were described in the USA after the approval of pegcetacoplan (39). The effects of treatment on retinal structure and function as well as possible adverse events over a further three years are now being studied in GALE, an open-label extension trial (NCT04770545).
In Europe, the marketing authorization application for both drugs was withdrawn by the manufacturers after a negative judgment was expressed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Although the EMA recognized the unmet medical need for an effective treatment, it justified its rejection on the ground that the significant slowing of atrophy progression that had been achieved in the approval trials did not lead to a clinically relevant functional benefit for the patients and thus does not outweigh the risks, including intraocular inflammation (40). Post-hoc analyses showed that the rate of persistent loss of 15 letters within 12 months was lowered by the treatment (7.8% in the control group versus 3.4% with avacincaptad pegol) (e1), but this finding did not persuade the EMA. Further studies are needed to elucidate the cause of the seeming contradiction between the structural and functional results, and to study these patients’ long-term course. The identification of predictive biomarkers with multimodal imaging may help identify subgroups in which a clear functional benefit can be demonstrated.
Aside from intravitreal complement inhibitors, other therapeutic approaches are now being studied in clinical trials, including intravitreally injected neuroprotective drugs, subretinally injected RPE cells grown from embryonic stem cells, subretinal implantation of a bionic retinal chip, and gene therapy (12) (Figure 4, eFigure). The last three approaches might yield a permanent effect with a single intervention. Approaches to gene therapy for GA are based on the applied active substances that enable the cellular transduction of plasmids via viral vectors, thereby inducing the secretion of inhibitory proteins of the complement system (e2). In the fall of 2023, a phase II study of gene therapy for complement inhibition was terminated early on the advice of the Data Monitoring Committee after an evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio (e3, e4). The subretinal application of patches consisting of pluripotent stem cells has already been investigated in phase I/II trials, but its clinical application is not yet within reach. The situation is different with the subretinal implantation of microchips that, with the aid of special eyeglasses with a built-in microcamera, receive image signals and energy via infrared projection and then transmit electrical impulses to the optic nerve. This treatment even carries the prospect of a certain degree of visual improvement. The results of the multicenter PRIMAvera intervention trial (NCT04676854) are expected to become available this year (e5, e6).
Perspectives
Blindness due to neovascular AMD has become much less common since the introduction of anti-VEGF therapy in 2006 (7), but GA remains one of the more common causes of irreversible loss of vision. While no treatment for GA has been approved to date in Europe, intravitreal complement inhibitors were approved and has been available in the United States since 2023 that can significantly slow the progression of the GA area. This treatment, however, cannot stop the disease or improve vision. Moreover, the need for repeated treatments over the long term is burdensome for patients and their families and poses a challenge for physicians and the healthcare system. In the future, it is hoped that preventive treatments will become available that can prevent the development of AMD or slow the progression of early AMD to a more advanced stage. In the meantime, it remains important to advise patients in detail about lifestyle changes that can promote their visual health and about rehabilitative measures, such as magnifying visual aids, that can help them meet the demands of everyday life.
Conflict of interest statement
SL has served as a paid consultant for Apellis, Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, and Novartis. She has received payment for presentations at continuing medical education events from Apellis, Astellas, Bayer, Heidelberg Engineering, Janssen, Novartis, AbbVie, Biogen, Roche, and Zeiss.
Her institution received research funding from Novartis and Roche.
LvdE has served as a paid consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and has received lecture honoraria from Heidelberg Engineering.
TA has served as a paid consultant for Apellis. He has received lecture honoraria from Apellis, Heidelberg Engineering, Bayer, Novartis, and Roche. He has received support for travel expenses from Apellis. He holds two patents: German patent application 10 2022 132 717.5 and US patent APP 18/532, 270, 2024.
FGH has served as a paid consultant for Acucela, Alcon, Alexion, Alzheon, Apellis, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Genentech/Roche, Grayburg Vision, Heidelberg Engineering, ivericBio/Astellas, Lin Bioscience, Janssen, Novartis, Oculis, Opthea, Oxurion, PixiumScience, Stealth Biotherapeutics, and Zeiss.
His institution has received research funding from Acucela, Allergan, Apellis, Bayer, Belite Bio, Bioeq, Centervue, Geuder, Roche/Genentech, Heidelberg Engineering, ivericBio/Astellas, NightStarx, Novartis, Optos, and Zeiss.
MLB states that he has no conflict of interest.
Manuscript submitted on 23 September 2024, revised version accepted on 8 January 2025.
Translated from the original German by Ethan Taub, M.D.
Corresponding author
Prof. Dr. med. Sandra Liakopoulos
Klinik für Augenheilkunde,
Universitätsklinikum der Goethe-Universität
Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Sandra.Liakopoulos@uk-koeln.de
Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Prof. Dr. med. Sandra Liakopoulos, Dr. med. Marvin L. Biller
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany: PD Dr. med. Leon von der Emde, Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Ach, Prof. Dr. med. Frank G. Holz
GRADE Reading Center, Bonn: Prof. Dr. med. Frank G. Holz
1. | Fink DJ, Terheyden JH, Berger M, et al.: The importance of visual health-a representative population survey. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2022; 119: 506–7 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
2. | Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M, Mauschitz MM, Holz FG, Finger RP: Prevalence and incidence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 104:1077–84 CrossRef MEDLINE |
3. | Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al.: Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2: e106–16 CrossRef MEDLINE |
4. | Colijn JM, Buitendijk GHS, Prokofyeva E, et al.: EYE-RISK consortium; European Eye Epidemiology (E3) consortium. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in europe: the past and the future. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1753–63 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
5. | Owsley C, Swain TA, McGwin G Jr, et al.: How vision is impaired from aging to early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration: insights from ALSTAR2 baseline. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2022; 11: 1 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
6. | Ferris FL 3rd, Wilkinson CP, Bird A, et al.: Beckman initiative for macular research classification committee. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 844–51 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
7. | Finger RP, Daien V, Eldem BM, et al.: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in neovascular age-related macular degeneration—a systematic review of the impact of anti-VEGF on patient outcomes and healthcare systems. BMC Ophthalmol 2020; 20: 294 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
8. | Bubendorfer-Vorwerk H, Schuster A, Lewis P, Picker N, Finger R (eds.): Prevalence of geographic atrophy in Germany—an assessment derived from literature-based estimates and claims data results. 35th International Congress of German Ophthalmic Surgery (DOC); 2023. www.egms.de/static/en/meetings/doc2023/23doc027.shtml (last accessed on 16 July 2024). |
9. | Chakravarthy U, Bailey CC, Johnston RL, et al.: Characterizing disease burden and progression of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 842–9 CrossRef MEDLINE |
10. | Heier JS, Lad EM, Holz FG, et al.: Pegcetacoplan for the treatment of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (OAKS and DERBY): two multicentre, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2023; 402: 1434–48 CrossRef MEDLINE |
11. | Khanani AM, Patel SS, Staurenghi G, et al.: Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 402: 1449–58 CrossRef MEDLINE |
12. | Cabral de Guimaraes TA, Daich Varela M, Georgiou M, Michaelides M: Treatments for dry age-related macular degeneration: therapeutic avenues, clinical trials and future directions. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; 106: 297–304 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
13. | Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Brinkmann CK, Alten F, et al.: Semiautomated image processing method for identification and quantification of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7640–6 CrossRef CrossRef |
14. | Pfau M, von der Emde L, de Sisternes L, et al.: Progression of photoreceptor degeneration in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2020; 138: 1026–34 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
15. | Thiele S, Nadal J, Pfau M, et al.: Prognostic value of intermediate age-related macular degeneration phenotypes for geographic atrophy progression. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105: 239–245 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
16. | Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, Seddon JM, Ferris FL 3rd: Age-related eye disease study research group. Risk factors for the incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration in the age-related eye disease study (AREDS) AREDS report no. 19. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 5–9 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
17. | Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR: Smoking and age-related maculopathy. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114 :1518–23 CrossRef MEDLINE |
18. | Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group: A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1417–36 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
19. | Myers CE, Klein BE, Gangnon R, Sivakumaran TA, Iyengar SK, Klein R: Cigarette smoking and the natural history of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 1949–55 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
20. | Jonasson F, Fisher DE, Eiriksdottir G, et al.: Five-year incidence, progression, and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: the age, gene/environment susceptibility study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 1766–72 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
21. | Fritsche LG, Igl W, Bailey JN, et al.: A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet 2016; 48: 134–43 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
22. | Sobrin L, Yang JY: Not all genes are created equal in age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140: 260–1 CrossRef MEDLINE |
23. | Jaffe GJ, Chakravarthy U, Freund KB, et al.: Imaging features associated with progression to geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: classification of atrophy meeting report 5. Ophthalmol Retina 2021; 5: 855–67 CrossRef MEDLINE |
24. | Agrón E, Mares J, Chew EY, Keenan TDL: AREDS2 research group. Adherence to a mediterranean diet and geographic atrophy enlargement rate: age-related eye disease study 2 Report 29. Ophthalmol Retina 2022; 6: 762–70 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
25. | Ferris FL, Davis MD, Clemons TE, et al.: Age-related eye disease study (AREDS) research group. A simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 1570–4 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
26. | Spaide RF: Improving the age-related macular degeneration construct: a new classification system. Retina. 2018; 38: 891–9 CrossRef MEDLINE |
27. | Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Sadda S, Staurenghi G, Chew EY, Fleckenstein M, Holz FG: CAM (classification of atrophy meeting)-group. Geographic atrophy: semantic considerations and literature review. Retina 2016; 36: 2250–64 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
28. | Holz FG, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G, et al.: CAM group: Imaging protocols in clinical studies in advanced age-related macular degeneration: recommendations from classification of atrophy consensus meetings. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 464–78 CrossRef MEDLINE |
29. | Sadda SR, Guymer R, Holz FG, et al.: Consensus definition for atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration on OCT: classification of atrophy report 3. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 537–48 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
30. | Guymer RH, Rosenfeld PJ, Curcio CA, et al.: Incomplete retinal pigment epithelial and outer retinal atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: classification of atrophy meeting report 4. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 394–409 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
31. | Khanifar AA, Lederer DE, Ghodasra JH, et al.: Comparison of color fundus photographs and fundus autofluorescence images in measuring geographic atrophy area. Retina 2012; 32: 1884–91 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
32. | von der Emde L, Saßmannshausen M, Morelle O, et al.: Reliability of retinal layer annotation with a novel, high-resolution optical coherence tomography device: a comparative study. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10: 438 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
33. | von der Emde L, Pfau M, Holz FG, et al.: AI-based structure-function correlation in age-related macular degeneration. Eye 2021; 35: 2110–18 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
34. | Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group: A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1417–36 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
35. | Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group: Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 309: 2005–15 CrossRef MEDLINE |
36. | Keenan TD, Agrón E, Mares J, et al.: Age-Related Eye Disease Studies (AREDS) 1 and 2 Research Groups: Adherence to the mediterranean diet and progression to late age-related macular degeneration in the age-related eye disease studies 1 and 2. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 1515–28 CrossRef MEDLINE |
37. | Keenan TDL, Agrón E, Keane PA, Domalpally A, Chew EY; Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group; Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Research Group: Oral antioxidant and lutein/zeaxanthin supplements slow geographic atrophy progression to the fovea in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2024; S0161–6420: 00425–1 CrossRef MEDLINE |
38. | Spaide RF, Vavvas DG: Complement inhibition for geographic atrophy: review of salient functional outcomes and perspective. Retina 2023; 43:1064–9 CrossRef |
39. | Witkin AJ, Jaffe GJ, Srivastava SK, Davis JL, Kim JE: Retinal vasculitis after intravitreal pegcetacoplan: report from the ASRS research and safety in therapeutics (ReST) Committee. J Vitreoretin Dis 2023; 8: 9–20 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
40. | www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/syfovre (last accessed on 18 November 2024). |
e1. | Danzig CJ, Khanani AM, Kaiser PK, et al.: Vision loss reduction with avacincaptad pegol for geographic atrophy: a 12-month post hoc analysis of the GATHER1 and GATHER2 trials. Ophthalmol Retina 2024; 8:1052–60 CrossRef MEDLINE |
e2. | Waheed NK FOCUS interim results: GT005 gene therapy phase I/II study for the treatment of geographic atrophy. angiogenesis, exudation, and degeneration. 2021. www.gyroscopetx.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Waheed-Focus_FINAL.pdf (last accessed on 16 July 2024). |
e3. | Nielsen J, MacLaren RE, Heier JS, et al.: Preliminary results from a first-in-human phase I/II gene therapy study (focus) of subretinally delivered GT005, an investigational AAV2 vector, in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2022; 63: 1504. |
e4. | Press Release GT005: www.novartis.com/news/gt005-ppy988-development-program-geographic-atrophy (last accessed on 19 January 2025). |
e5. | Muqit MMK, Mer YL, Holz FG, Sahel JA: Long-term observations of macular thickness after subretinal implantation of a photovoltaic prosthesis in patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration. J Neural Eng 2022; 19: 10 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
e6. | Muqit MMK, Le Mer Y, Olmos de Koo L, Holz FG, Sahel JA, Palanker D: Prosthetic visual acuity with the PRIMA subretinal microchip in patients with atrophic age-related macular degeneration at 4 years follow-up. Ophthalmol Sci 2024; 4: 100510 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |
e7. | Zanzottera EC, Ach T, Huisingh C, Messinger JD, Spaide RF, Curcio CA: Visualizing retinal pigment epithelium phenotypes in the transition to geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2016; 36 Suppl 1: S12–5 CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central |