DÄ internationalArchive7/2026Consent in intensive care: The concurrence of patients’ and families’ viewpoints. A simulation study

Original article

Consent in intensive care: The concurrence of patients’ and families’ viewpoints. A simulation study

Dtsch Arztebl Int 2026; 123: 177-83. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0242

Boenisch, O; Schirmer, L; Zapf, A; Lühmann, D; Grein, B; Bangert-Tobies, K; Huber, T B; Reichenspurner, H; Blankenberg, S; Heer, G d; Tohsche, P; Scherer, M; Schäfer, I; Kluge, S

For technical reasons, the English full text will be published approximately two weeks after the German print edition has been published.

*Die Autoren haben zu gleichen Teilen zu dieser Arbeit beigetragen.
Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: PD Dr. med. Olaf Boenisch, Dr. med. Lena Schirmer, Dr. med. Burkhard Grein, Dr. med. Katrin Bangert-Tobies, Dr. med. Geraldine de Heer, Peter Tohsche, Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Kluge
Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Interdisziplinäre Konservative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel: PD Dr. med. Olaf Boenisch
Institut für medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Antonia Zapf
Institut und Poliklinik für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: Dr. med. Dagmar Lühmann, Prof. Dr. med. Martin Scherer, PD Dr. phil. Ingmar Schäfer
III. Medizinische Klinik, Nephrologie/Rheumatologie mit Sektion Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: Prof. Dr. med. Tobias B. Huber
Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: Prof. Dr. med. Hermann Reichenspurner
Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg: Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Blankenberg
1.Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al.: Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1370–9. CrossRef MEDLINE
2. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al.: Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet 2004; 364: 1421–7. CrossRef MEDLINE
3. DeMartino ES, Dudzinski DM, Doyle CK, et al.: Who decides when a patient can‘t? Statutes on alternate decision makers. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1478–82. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
4.Kolva E, Rosenfeld B, Saracino R: Assessing the decision-making capacity of terminally Ill patients with cancer. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018; 26: 523–31. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
5.Sui W, Gong X, Qiao X, et al.: Family members‘ perceptions of surrogate decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2023; 137: 104391. CrossRef MEDLINE
6.Lei Y, Sui W, Chen L, Zhou Q, Zhuang Y: The experience of surrogate decision-making and deciphering critically ill patient values: A qualitative study. Nurs Crit Care 2025; 30: e13171. CrossRef MEDLINE
7.Torke AM, Sachs GA, Helft PR, et al.: Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 370–7. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
8.Zaros MC, Curtis JR, Silveira MJ, Elmore JG: Opportunity lost: end-of-life discussions in cancer patients who die in the hospital. J Hosp Med 2013; 8: 334–40. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
9. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D: The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 493–7. CrossRef MEDLINE
10.Spalding R. Accuracy in surrogate end-of-life medical decision-making: A critical review. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2021; 13: 3–33. CrossRef MEDLINE
11.Ouslander JG, Tymchuk AJ, Rahbar B: Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1367–72. CrossRef MEDLINE
12.Coppolino M, Ackerson L: Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 2001; 119: 603–12. CrossRef MEDLINE
13.Bryant J, Skolarus LE, Smith B, Adelman EE, Meurer WJ: The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: informed consent in hypothetical acute stroke scenarios. BMC Emerg Med 2013; 13: 18. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
14.Spalding RL, Edelstein B: Exploring variables related to medical surrogate decision-making accuracy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105: 311–21. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
15.Sulmasy DP, Sugarman J. Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? J Med Ethics: 1994; 20: 218–24. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
16.Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA, Cain KC: Understanding of elderly patients‘ resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses. West J Med 1989; 150: 705–7.
17. Zweibel NR, Cassel CK: Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist 1989; 29: 615–21. CrossRef MEDLINE
18.Moorman SM, Carr D: Spouses‘ effectiveness as end-of-life health care surrogates: Accuracy, uncertainty, and errors of overtreatment or undertreatment. Gerontologist 2008; 48: 811–9. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
19.Schmid B, Allen RS, Haley PP, Decoster J: Family matters: Dyadic agreement in end-of-life medical decision making. Gerontologist 2010; 50: 226–37. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
20.Tomlinson T, Howe K, Notman M, Rossmiller D: An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. Gerontologist 1990; 30: 54–64. CrossRef MEDLINE
21.Suhl J, Simons P, Reedy T, Garrick T: Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 90–6. CrossRef MEDLINE
22.Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ: The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 977–88. CrossRef MEDLINE
23.Wilson KA, Dowling AJ, Abdolell M, Tannock IF: Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 1041–52. CrossRef MEDLINE
24.Milne DJ, Mulder LL, Beelen HC, Schofield P, Kempen GI, Aranda S: Patients‘ self-report and family caregivers‘ perception of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: How do they compare? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006; 15: 125–32. CrossRef MEDLINE
25.Kassir ZM, Li J, Harrison C, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML: Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers. BMC Cancer 2021; 21: 1127. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
26.Bravo G, Sene M, Arcand M: Surrogate inaccuracy in predicting older adults‘ desire for life-sustaining interventions in the event of decisional incapacity: is it due in part to erroneous quality-of-life assessments? Int Psychogeriatr 2017; 29: 1061–8. CrossRef MEDLINE
27.Smucker WD, Houts RM, Danks JH, Ditto PH, Fagerlin A, Coppola KM: Modal preferences predict elderly patients‘ life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients‘ chosen surrogates do. Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 271–80. CrossRef MEDLINE
28.Evans N, Bausewein C, Meñaca A, et al.: A critical review of advance directives in Germany: Attitudes, use and healthcare professionals‘ compliance. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 87: 277–88. CrossRef MEDLINE
29.Sulmasy DP, Haller K, Terry PB: More talk, less paper: Predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med 1994; 96: 432–8. CrossRef MEDLINE
30.Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, et al.: Randomized trial of communication facilitators to reduce family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 154–62. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
31.Krones T, Budilivschi A, Karzig I, et al.: Advance care planning for the severely ill in the hospital: a randomized trial. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 12: e411–e23. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
32. Marbella AM, Desbiens NA, Mueller-Rizner N, Layde PM: Surrogates‘ agreement with patients‘ resuscitation preferences: Effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. J Crit Care 1998; 13: 140–5. CrossRef MEDLINE
33.White DB: Rethinking interventions to improve surrogate decision making in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care 2011; 20: 252–7. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
34.Bibas L, Peretz-Larochelle M, Adhikari NK, et al.: Association of surrogate decision-making interventions for critically Ill adults with patient, family, and resource use outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e197229. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
35.Neitzke G, Böll B, Burchardi H, et al.: Dokumentation der Therapiebegrenzung. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2017; 112: 527–30.
36. Michalsen A, Neitzke G, Dutzmann J, et al.: Überversorgung in der Intensivmedizin: Erkennen, benennen, vermeiden: Positionspapier der Sektion Ethik der DIVI und der Sektion Ethik der DGIIN. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2021; 116: 281–94. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central
37.Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Reinhart K, et al.: Hospitalization and intensive therapy at the end of life. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2019; 116: 653–60. VOLLTEXT
38.Baum MY, Gallo JJ, Nolan MT, et al.: Does it matter who decides? Outcomes of surrogate decision-making for community-dwelling, cognitively impaired older adults near the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62: 1126–34. CrossRef MEDLINE PubMed Central